Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' ''

Details Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' '' Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' ''

Apr 1999

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999phrvd..59h8502n&link_type=abstract

Physical Review D (Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology), Volume 59, Issue 8, 15 April 1999, id. 088502

Physics

11

Spacetime Topology, Causal Structure, Spinor Structure, Gravity In More Than Four Dimensions, Kaluza-Klein Theory, Unified Field Theories, Alternative Theories Of Gravity, Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime

Scientific paper

This reply to the Comment by Bloomfield clarifies that the Brans-Dicke
wormhole condition is (C+1)2>λ2 rather
than (C+1)>λ, as suggested in our earlier paper. Various cases
depending on the signs of (C+1) and λ arise. The radial tidal
accelerations are indeed finite, as correctly pointed out by Bloomfield.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' '' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' '', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to ``Comment on `Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames' '' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-894058