Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, 1 figure, Latex2e. Extensive modifications have been made to increase clarity. To appear in FOCS'99

Scientific paper

Consider the finite regular language L_n = {w0 : w \in {0,1}^*, |w| \le n}. It was shown by Ambainis, Nayak, Ta-Shma and Vazirani that while this language is accepted by a deterministic finite automaton of size O(n), any one-way quantum finite automaton (QFA) for it has size 2^{Omega(n/log n)}. This was based on the fact that the evolution of a QFA is required to be reversible. When arbitrary intermediate measurements are allowed, this intuition breaks down. Nonetheless, we show a 2^{Omega(n)} lower bound for such QFA for L_n, thus also improving the previous bound. The improved bound is obtained by simple entropy arguments based on Holevo's theorem. This method also allows us to obtain an asymptotically optimal (1-H(p))n bound for the dense quantum codes (random access codes) introduced by Ambainis et al. We then turn to Holevo's theorem, and show that in typical situations, it may be replaced by a tighter and more transparent in-probability bound.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-87756

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.