Evidence for massive ionised outflows in (super-Eddington?) AGN

Physics – Nuclear Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Scientific paper

Following the discovery of X-ray absorption in a high velocity outflow from the bright quasar PG1211+143 we have searched for similar features in XNN-Newton archival data of a second (high accretion rate) quasar PG0844+349. Evidence is found for several faint absorption lines in both the EPIC and RGS spectra, whose most likely identification with resonance transitions in H-like Fe, S, and Ne implies an origin in highly ionised matter with an outflow velocity of order ~0.2c. The line equivalent widths require a line-of-sight column density of NH~4×1023 cm-2, at an ionisation parameter of logξ~3.7. Assuming a radial outflow being driven by radiation pressure from the inner accretion disc, as suggested previously for PG1211+143, the flow in PG0844+349 is also likely to be optically thick, in this case within ~25 Schwarzschild radii. We suggest that a high velocity, highly ionised outflow may be a significant component in the mass and energy budgets of AGN accreting at or above the Eddington rate.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Evidence for massive ionised outflows in (super-Eddington?) AGN does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Evidence for massive ionised outflows in (super-Eddington?) AGN, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evidence for massive ionised outflows in (super-Eddington?) AGN will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-859387

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.