Philosophy and Modern Science

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

THE necessity for condensed expression is, I think, responsible for the questions raised by Dr. Jeffreys. I admit (indeed, insist on) the distinction between sensations and concepts, but left it unstated because I thought it was implied in the language used. The principle of rejection of unobservables must refer only to concepts; we cannot speak of observing sensations because a sensation is an observation, not a thing to be observed. I cannot reject a sensation of whiteness which may come to me, but I can reject the concept, ghost. I do not share Dr. Jeffreys's objection to the phrase, ``observing a concept'' (for example, observing Neptune). It is unambiguous and far more concise than any alternative which his letter suggests.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Philosophy and Modern Science does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Philosophy and Modern Science, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Philosophy and Modern Science will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-740204

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.