Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction'

Details Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction' Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction'

2010-10-20

arxiv.org/abs/1010.4161v1

Physics

Optics

Scientific paper

Kinsler and Favaro point out correctly that Blaikie's numerical solution of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye is causal and hence valid, a solution where no perfect image is formed. It is wrong to conclude from the existence of a causal solution with perfect imaging that one without perfect resolution is not causal; both are allowed by causality. However, Maxwell's fish eye can still perfectly image, as the Reply shows.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-717186