The elusiveness of multifragmentation footprints in 1-GeV proton-nucleus reactions

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

38 pages, 20 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. C

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064615

We use the tools of hybrid intranuclear-cascade/nuclear-de-excitation models to evaluate the sensitivity of several physical observables to the inclusion of a multifragmentation stage in the de-excitation chain and assess the need for a multifragmentation model in the quantitative description of p+56Fe and p+136Xe reactions at 1-GeV incident energy. We seek clear signatures of multifragmentation by comparing different state-of-the-art de-excitation models coupled with intranuclear-cascade models and by focusing on discriminating observables such as correlations and fragment longitudinal-velocity distributions. None of the considered observables can be unambiguously interpreted as a multifragmentation footprint. The experimental data are best described as originating from sequential binary decays. However, no de-excitation model can reproduce the experimental longitudinal-velocity distributions from 1-GeV p+136Xe.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The elusiveness of multifragmentation footprints in 1-GeV proton-nucleus reactions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The elusiveness of multifragmentation footprints in 1-GeV proton-nucleus reactions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The elusiveness of multifragmentation footprints in 1-GeV proton-nucleus reactions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-686331

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.