Models for RHIC and LHC: New Developments

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

talk given at the ``15thInternational Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions'', Quark Matter 2001, Stony B

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01386-0

We outline inconsistencies in presently used models for high energy nuclear scattering, which make their application quite unreliable. Many "successes" are essentially based on an artificial freedom of parameters, which does not exist when the models are constructed properly. The problem is the fact that any multiple scattering theory requires an appropriate treatment of the energy sharing between the individual interactions, which is technically very difficult to implement. Lacking a satisfying solution to this problem, it has been simply ignored. We introduce a fully self-consistent formulation of the multiple-scattering scheme. Inclusion of soft and hard components - very crucial at high energies - appears in a "natural way", providing a smooth transition from soft to hard physics. We can show that the effect of appropriately considering energy conservation has a big influence on the results, and MUST therefore be included in any serious calculation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Models for RHIC and LHC: New Developments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Models for RHIC and LHC: New Developments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Models for RHIC and LHC: New Developments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-659880

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.