Reply to Comment on the paper ``Energy Loss of Charm Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Collisional vs Radiative'' by Mishra et al

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages

Scientific paper

The comments raised in Ref. [1] by Mishra et al aim at two papers contained in Ref. [2]. We show that those comments on Ref. [2] pointed out by Mishra et al in Ref.[1] are not relevant and the concept used in Ref.[2] is consistent and in compliance with the classical approximation of the transport coefficients [3]. We would also like to note that most of the comments in Ref. [1] were meant for light quarks, but are not even appropriate for heavy quarks.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to Comment on the paper ``Energy Loss of Charm Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Collisional vs Radiative'' by Mishra et al does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Comment on the paper ``Energy Loss of Charm Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Collisional vs Radiative'' by Mishra et al, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Comment on the paper ``Energy Loss of Charm Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Collisional vs Radiative'' by Mishra et al will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-657166

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.