Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2001-04-24
Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 074011; Erratum-ibid. D65 (2002) 039901
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
8 pages, LaTeX, 1 figure, correction of version published in Phys. Rev. D (Errata sent to journal)
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074011
The rates for magnetic dipole (M1) transitions $\Upsilon(nS) \to \eta_b(n'S) + \gamma$, $n' \le n$, are compared. The photon energies for allowed ($n' = n$) M1 transitions are very small, so hindered ($n' < n$) transitions could be more favorable for discovering the $\eta_b(1S,2S)$. The question then arises whether $\Upsilon(2S)$ or $\Upsilon(3S)$ is a better source of $\eta_b(1S)$. Whereas one nonrelativistic model favors $\eta_b(1S)$ production from $\Upsilon(2S)$, this advantage is lost when relativistic corrections are taken into account, and is not common to all sets of wave functions even in the purely nonrelativistic limit. Thus, the prospects for discovering $\eta_b(1S)$ in $\Upsilon(3S)$ radiative decays could be comparable to those in $\Upsilon(2S)$ decays. We also discuss a suggestion for discovering the $\eta_b$ via $\Upsilon(3S) \to h_b(^1P_1) \pi \pi$, followed by $h_b \to \eta_b \gamma$.
Godfrey Stephen
Rosner Jonathan L.
No associations
LandOfFree
Production of the $η_b(nS)$ states does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Production of the $η_b(nS)$ states, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Production of the $η_b(nS)$ states will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-647918