Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

To appear in Synthese

Scientific paper

Tim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin's argument is taken as ruling out Cramer's heuristic ``pseudotime'' explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-647259

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.