Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Afshar et al. claim that their experiment shows a violation of the complementarity inequality. In this work, we study their claim using a modified Mach-Zehnder setup that represents a simpler version of the Afshar experiment. We find that our results are consistent with Afshar et al. experimental findings. However, we show that within standard quantum mechanics the results of the Afshar experiment do not lead to a violation of the complementarity inequality. We show that their claim originates from a particular technique they use to analyze their results. In their analysis, they assume a classical concept, that particles have a definite trajectory before detection, thus, they obtain which-way information by particle detection plus path extrapolation by applying momentum conservation. This analysis technique is standard in experimental particle physics. Important discoveries such as the detection of vector bosons have been made through the application of this technique. We note that particle detection plus path extrapolation is a suitable technique within de Broglie-Bohm theory of quantum mechanics.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-645453

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.