Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2011-03-30
Physics
Quantum Physics
14 pages, written in memory of Itamar Pitowsky
Scientific paper
The probabilities a Bayesian agent assigns to a set of events typically change with time, for instance when the agent updates them in the light of new data. In this paper we address the question of how an agent's probabilities at different times are constrained by Dutch-book coherence. We review and attempt to clarify the argument that, although an agent is not forced by coherence to use the usual Bayesian conditioning rule to update his probabilities, coherence does require the agent's probabilities to satisfy van Fraassen's [1984] reflection principle (which entails a related constraint pointed out by Goldstein [1983]). We then exhibit the specialized assumption needed to recover Bayesian conditioning from an analogous reflection-style consideration. Bringing the argument to the context of quantum measurement theory, we show that "quantum decoherence" can be understood in purely personalist terms---quantum decoherence (as supposed in a von Neumann chain) is not a physical process at all, but an application of the reflection principle. From this point of view, the decoherence theory of Zeh, Zurek, and others as a story of quantum measurement has the plot turned exactly backward.
Fuchs Christopher A.
Schack Ruediger
No associations
LandOfFree
Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-568824