Why the paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) is scientifically unacceptable

Physics – Instrumentation and Detectors

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

The paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) by A. Bagulya et al. violates standards of quality of work and scientific ethics on several counts. The paper contains assertions that contradict established detector physics. The paper falls short of proving the correctness of the authors' concepts and results. The paper ignores or quotes misleadingly pertinent published work. The paper ignores the fact that the authors' concepts and results have already been shown wrong in the published literature. The authors seem unaware that cross-section results from the 'HARP Collaboration' that are based on the paper's concepts and algorithms are in gross disagreement with the results of a second analysis of the same data, and with the results of other experiments.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why the paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) is scientifically unacceptable does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why the paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) is scientifically unacceptable, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why the paper CERN-PH-EP-2009-015 (arXiv:0903.4762) is scientifically unacceptable will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-555716

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.