Comparison of radiative energy loss models in a hot QCD medium

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Proceedings Hard Probes 2010, October 10-15, Eilat (Israel)

Scientific paper

The suppression of high $p_{T}$ hadron production in heavy ion collisions is thought to be due to energy loss by gluon radiation off hard partons in a QCD medium. Existing models of QCD radiative energy loss in a color-charged medium give estimates of the coupling strength of the parton to the medium which differ by a factor of $5$. We will present a side-by-side comparison of two different formalisms to calculate the energy loss of light quarks and gluons: the multiple soft scattering approximation (ASW-MS) and the opacity expansion formalism (ASW-SH and WHDG-rad). A common time-temperature profile is used to characterize the medium. The results are compared to the single hadron suppression $R_{AA}$ at RHIC energies. In addition the influcence of homogeneous and non-homogeneous distribution of scattering centers is discussed. We find that using an equivalent brick overestimates the energy loss for long parton trajectories.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparison of radiative energy loss models in a hot QCD medium does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of radiative energy loss models in a hot QCD medium, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of radiative energy loss models in a hot QCD medium will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-515032

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.