Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase'

Details Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase' Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase'

2001-09-27

arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109139v2

Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268902 (2002).

Physics

Quantum Physics

2 pages

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268902

The only difference between Bhandari's viewpoint [quant-ph/0108058] and ours
[Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845 (2000)] is that our phase is defined modulo $2\pi$,
whereas Bhandari argues that two phases that differ by $2\pi n$, $n$ integer,
may be distinguished experimentally in a history-dependent manner.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to `Singularities of the mixed state phase' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-514257