Selecting a Model of Supersymmetry Breaking Mediation

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

38 pages, 11 figures. Version 3: comment on relic density likelihood added

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.80.035017

We study the problem of selecting between different mechanisms of supersymmetry breaking in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model using current data. We evaluate the Bayesian evidence of four supersymmetry breaking scenarios: mSUGRA, mGMSB, mAMSB and moduli mediation. The results show a strong dependence on the dark matter assumption. Using the inferred cosmological relic density as an upper bound, minimal anomaly mediation is at least moderately favoured over the CMSSM. Our fits also indicate that evidence for a positive sign of the mu parameter is moderate at best. We present constraints on the anomaly and gauge mediated parameter spaces and some previously unexplored aspects of the dark matter phenomenology of the moduli mediation scenario. We use sparticle searches, indirect observables and dark matter observables in the global fit and quantify robustness with respect to prior choice. We quantify how much information is contained within each constraint.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Selecting a Model of Supersymmetry Breaking Mediation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Selecting a Model of Supersymmetry Breaking Mediation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Selecting a Model of Supersymmetry Breaking Mediation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-495109

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.