Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
1994-05-24
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
REVTEX, 16 pages, 1 postscriptum figure uuencoded and appended
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.231
The experimental PNC results in $^{18}$F, $^{19}$F, $^{21}$Ne and the current theoretical analysis show a discrepancy . If one interprets the small limit of the experimentally extracted PNC matrix element for $^{21}$Ne as a destructive interference between the isoscalar and the isovector contribution, then it is difficult to understand why the isovector contribution in $^{18}$F is so small while the isoscalar + isovector contribution in $^{19}$F is relatively large. In order to understand the origin of this discrepancy a comparison of the calculated PNC matrix elements was performed. It is shown that the $^{18}$F and $^{21}$Ne matrix elements contain important contributions from 3$\hbar \omega$ and 4$\hbar \omega$ configuration and that the (0+1)$\hbar \omega$ calculations give distorted results.
Brown Alex B.
Horoi Mihai
No associations
LandOfFree
Toward a Consistent Description of the PNC Experiments in A=18-21 Nuclei does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Toward a Consistent Description of the PNC Experiments in A=18-21 Nuclei, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Toward a Consistent Description of the PNC Experiments in A=18-21 Nuclei will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-494342