String Theory and General Methodology; a Reciprocal Evaluation

Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Revised version published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. The published version has the slightly diffe

Scientific paper

10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.06.004

String theory has been the dominating research field in theoretical physics during the last decades. Despite the considerable time elapse, no new testable predictions have been derived by string theorists and it is understandable that doubts have been voiced. Some people have argued that it is time to give up since testability is wanting. But the majority has not been convinced and they continue to believe that string theory is the right way to go. This situation is interesting for philosophy of science since it highligts several of our central issues. In this paper we will discuss string theory from a number of different perspectives in general methodology. We will also relate the realism/antirealism debate to the current status of string theory. Our goal is two-fold; both to take a look at string theory from philosophical perspectives and to use string theory as a test case for some philosophical issues.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

String Theory and General Methodology; a Reciprocal Evaluation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with String Theory and General Methodology; a Reciprocal Evaluation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and String Theory and General Methodology; a Reciprocal Evaluation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-49154

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.