Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2006-03-20
Phys.Rev.Lett.97:062002,2006
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
4 pages, 3 figures
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.062002
In spite of prolonged polemics, the agreement on the existence of N(1710) P11 resonance has not until now been reached, and the Particle Data Group declares it as a 3-star resonance only. We show that the proper inclusion of inelastic channels in the coupled-channel formalism indisputably demands the existence of N(1710) P11 state, and that it presumably stays "hidden" within the continuum ambiguity of any typical single channel partial wave analyses. Consequently, its Particle Data Group confidence rating should be raised to a 4-star resonance.
Ceci Sasa
Švarc Alfred
Zauner Branimir
No associations
LandOfFree
The piN --> etaN data demand the existence of N(1710) P11 resonance reducing the 1700 MeV continuum ambiguity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The piN --> etaN data demand the existence of N(1710) P11 resonance reducing the 1700 MeV continuum ambiguity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The piN --> etaN data demand the existence of N(1710) P11 resonance reducing the 1700 MeV continuum ambiguity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-450894