K^+ versus Λflow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

RevTeX, 11 pages, including 18 postscript figures, to be published in Nuclear Physics A

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00206-1

We study $K^+$ and $\Lambda$ flow in heavy-ion collisions at beam energies of about 2A GeV. We present our results in both the `traditional' (i.e., in terms of the average transverse momentum in the reaction plane) as well as `modern' (i.e., in terms of coefficients of the Fourier analysis of azimuthal distributions) methods of flow analysis. We find significant differences between the $K^+$ and the $\Lambda$ flow: while the $\Lambda$ flow is basically similar to that of nucleons, the $K^+$ flow almost disappears. This difference is attributed chiefly to their different mean field potentials in dense matter. The comparisons with the experimental data, as well as theoretical results from independent calculations, indicate clearly the pivotal roles of both $K^+$ and $\Lambda$ medium effects. We emphasize that similar experimental data from independent collaborations are essential for the eventual verification of these medium effects.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

K^+ versus Λflow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with K^+ versus Λflow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and K^+ versus Λflow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-446818

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.