Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM"

Details Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM" Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM"

2003-05-05

arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0305020v1

Physics

Quantum Physics

4 pages, no figures, Latex

Scientific paper

In a recent paper, Struyve et al. [Struyve W, De Baere W, De Neve J and De Weirdt S 2003 J. Phys. A 36 1525] attempted to show that the thought experiment proposed in [Golshani M and Akhavan O 2001 J. Phys. A 34 5259, quant-ph/0103101] cannot distinguish between standard and Bohmian quantum mechanics. Here, we want to show that, in spite of their objection, our conclusion still holds out.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-41596