Penrose Model potential, compared with Coleman-Weinberg Potential for early universe scalar evolution

Physics – General Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9 pages, 0 figures. In response to Dr. Penrose presenting his cyclic universe model, minus the big crunch presentation at the

Scientific paper

We present an overview of Dr. Penrose's model of a cyclic universe, minus the big crunch which relies upon black hole collection of matter after an a long term expansion phase from an initial big bang . We affirm that the suggested evolution equation presented at his lecture for his model meets requirements as to an emergent quintessence field from a vacuum state . We try to offer suggestions as to how to investigate his controversial conformal mapping of matter/energy via Hawkings radiation from a potentially infinite number of black holes to a new big bang. This is his 'ripples in a pond' effect which we find highly unusual but worth serious study and investigation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Penrose Model potential, compared with Coleman-Weinberg Potential for early universe scalar evolution does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Penrose Model potential, compared with Coleman-Weinberg Potential for early universe scalar evolution, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Penrose Model potential, compared with Coleman-Weinberg Potential for early universe scalar evolution will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-414080

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.