Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

This erratum corrects a missing factor in the formula in Phys.Rev.C76, 021902 (2007) [arXiv:0704.3625 [hep-ph]]

Scientific paper

We correct a mistake in the analytical expression for the energy density given in Phys. Rev. C76, 021902 (2007) [arXiv:0704.3625 [hep-ph]]. The expression should be multiplied by 16. One question then arises; how could it be possible to explain this difference between the analytical and numerical results in the same model if both are correct? We find a subtle problem in the treatment of the randomness of the color source along the longitudinal direction and the treatment of the longitudinal extent of the color source.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-3977

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.