Physics – Mathematical Physics
Scientific paper
2008-08-04
Journal of Cosmology 4 (2010) 719-735
Physics
Mathematical Physics
8 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables; presented at "The Clock and the Quantum: Time in Quantum Foundations", held at the Perimeter Ins
Scientific paper
Finite projective (lattice) geometries defined over rings instead of fields have recently been recognized to be of great importance for quantum information theory. We believe that there is much more potential hidden in these geometries to be unleashed for physics. There exist specific rings over which the projective spaces feature two principally distinct kinds of basic constituents (points and/or higher-rank linear subspaces), intricately interwoven with each other -- unimodular and non-unimodular. We conjecture that these two projective "degrees of freedom" can rudimentary be associated with spatial and temporal dimensions of physics, respectively. Our hypothesis is illustrated on the projective line over the smallest ring of ternions. Both the fundamental difference and intricate connection between time and space are demonstrated, and even the ring geometrical germs of the observed macroscopic dimensionality (3+1) of space-time and the arrow of time are outlined. Some other conceptual implications of this speculative model (like a hierarchical structure of physical systems) are also mentioned.
Pracna Petr
Saniga Metod
No associations
LandOfFree
Space versus Time: Unimodular versus Non-Unimodular Projective Ring Geometries? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Space versus Time: Unimodular versus Non-Unimodular Projective Ring Geometries?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Space versus Time: Unimodular versus Non-Unimodular Projective Ring Geometries? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-384571