Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

15 pages, LaTeX, added references for constant-H hypersurfaces and also an idea for minimal-flux hypersurfaces

Scientific paper

10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/025

Many cosmologists (myself included) have advocated volume weighting for the cosmological measure problem, weighting spatial hypersurfaces by their volume. However, this often leads to the Boltzmann brain problem, that almost all observations would be by momentary Boltzmann brains that arise very briefly as quantum fluctuations in the late universe when it has expanded to a huge size, so that our observations (too ordered for Boltzmann brains) would be highly atypical and unlikely. Here it is suggested that volume weighting may be a mistake. Volume averaging is advocated as an alternative. One consequence may be a loss of the argument that eternal inflation gives a nonzero probability that our universe now has infinite volume.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-383938

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.