To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent?

Details To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent? To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent?

2011-02-17

arxiv.org/abs/1102.3556v2

Physics

Quantum Physics

22 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

We investigate the consistency of coherent state (or Berezin-Klauder-Toeplitz, or anti-Wick) quantization in regard to physical observations in the non- relativistic (or Galilean) regime. We compare this procedure with the canonical quantization (on both mathematical and physical levels) and examine whether they are or not equivalent in their predictions: is it possible to dif- ferentiate them on a strictly physical level? As far as only usual dynamical observables (position, momentum, energy, ...) are concerned, the quantization through coherent states is proved to be a perfectly valid alternative. We successfully put to the test the validity of CS quantization in the case of data obtained from vibrational spectroscopy (data that allowed to validate canonical quantization in the early period of Quantum Mechanics).

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-380456