Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2000-05-31
Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 359-369 (1998)
Physics
Quantum Physics
LaTeX, 10 pages, no figures
Scientific paper
A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen
against the completeness of the quantum mechanical description is criticized as
a misrepresentation that lacks the cogency of the original EPR argument.
No associations
LandOfFree
Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Common misrepresentation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-362542