Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2006-03-12
Eur.Phys.J.C47:57-64,2006
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
13 pages, 2 figures, Small addition on systematic errors
Scientific paper
10.1140/epjc/s2006-02561-3
Ratios of coupling constants for these decays are compared with q-qbar predictions and Jaffe's 4-quark model. In both models, the predicted ratio g^2(kappa -> K-pi)/ g^2(sigma -> pi-pi) is much too small. Also, for q-qbar, the predicted ratio g^2(kappa -> K-eta ')/g^2(kappa -> K-pi) is much larger than observed. Both models fail for g^2(fo -> KK)/g^2(a0 -> KK). This ratio requires that fo has a dominant KK component. It arises naturally because the fo pole lies very close to the KK threshold, giving its wave function a long KK tail.
No associations
LandOfFree
Decays of sigma, kappa, a0(980) and fo(980) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Decays of sigma, kappa, a0(980) and fo(980), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Decays of sigma, kappa, a0(980) and fo(980) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-340116