Boltzmann's H-theorem, its limitations, and the birth of (fully) statistical mechanics

Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

40 pages

Scientific paper

A comparison is made of the traditional Loschmidt (reversibility) and Zermelo (recurrence) objections to Boltzmann's H-theorem, and its simplified variant in the Ehrenfests' 1912 wind-tree model. The little-cited 1896 (pre-recurrence) objection of Zermelo (similar to an 1889 argument due to Poincare) is also analysed. Significant differences between the objections are highlighted, and several old and modern misconceptions concerning both them and the H-theorem are clarified. We give particular emphasis to the radical nature of Poincare's and Zermelo's attack, and the importance of the shift in Boltzmann's thinking in response to the objections as a whole.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Boltzmann's H-theorem, its limitations, and the birth of (fully) statistical mechanics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Boltzmann's H-theorem, its limitations, and the birth of (fully) statistical mechanics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Boltzmann's H-theorem, its limitations, and the birth of (fully) statistical mechanics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-30623

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.