The generalized Newton's law of gravitation versus the general theory of relativity

Physics – General Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 LaTex pages, no figure: To appear in Gravitation and Cosmology, 2012

Scientific paper

Einstein general theory of relativity (GTR) accounted well for the precession of the perihelion of planets and binary pulsars. While the ordinary Newton law of gravitation failed, a generalized version yields similar results. We have shown here that these effects can be accounted for as due to the existence of gravitomagnetism only, and not necessarily due to the curvature of space time. Or alternatively, gravitomagnetism is equivalent to a curved space-time. The precession of the perihelion of planets and binary pulsars may be interpreted as due to the spin of the orbiting planet ($m$) about the Sun ($M$)\,. The spin ($S$) of planets is found to be related to their orbital angular momentum ($L$) by a simple formula, \emph{viz}., $S\propto \,\frac{m}{M}L$\,.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The generalized Newton's law of gravitation versus the general theory of relativity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The generalized Newton's law of gravitation versus the general theory of relativity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The generalized Newton's law of gravitation versus the general theory of relativity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-279359

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.