Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2011-07-14
Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 100402 (2012)
Physics
Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.100402
According to quantum theory, the outcomes obtained by measuring an entangled state necessarily exhibit some randomness if they violate a Bell inequality. In particular, a maximal violation of the CHSH inequality guarantees that 1.23 bits of randomness are generated by the measurements. However, by performing measurements with binary outcomes on two subsystems one could in principle generate up to two bits of randomness. We show that correlations that violate arbitrarily little the CHSH inequality or states with arbitrarily little entanglement can be used to certify that close to the maximum of two bits of randomness are produced. Our results show that non-locality, entanglement, and the amount of randomness that can be certified in a Bell-type experiment are inequivalent quantities. From a practical point of view, they imply that device-independent quantum key distribution with optimal key generation rate is possible using almost-local correlations and that device-independent randomness generation with optimal rate is possible with almost-local correlations and with almost-unentangled states.
Acin Antonio
Massar Serge
Pironio Stefano
No associations
LandOfFree
Randomness vs Non Locality and Entanglement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Randomness vs Non Locality and Entanglement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Randomness vs Non Locality and Entanglement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-224887