Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History

Details Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History

2008-03-31

arxiv.org/abs/0803.4245v1

Physics

General Physics

three pages

Scientific paper

This article describes epistemological distinctions between science and history. Science investigates models of natural law using repeatable experiments as the ultimate arbiter. In contrast, history investigates past events by considering physical evidence, documentary evidence, and eyewitness testimony. Because questions of natural law are repeatably testable by any audience that exercises due experimental care, models of natural law are inherently more objective and testable with greater certainty than theories of past events.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Epistemological Distinctions Between Science and History will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-196713