Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula''

Details Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula'' Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula''

Jan 1986

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1986phrvd..33..612c&link_type=abstract

Physical Review D (Particles and Fields), Volume 33, Issue 2, 15 January 1986, pp.612-613

Physics

Scientific paper

In the preceding Comment, Walker claims to have discovered an inconsistency in our axially symmetric gravitational two-body problem. We show that the Walker claim, the elements of which we had actually derived and considered in our earlier work, contains some misconceptions and is essentially based upon an erroneous measure of the dominant momentum density within our sources.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to ``On Cooperstock's counterexample to the gravitational-radiation quadrupole formula'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1847772