Physics
Scientific paper
Feb 2012
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2012jgra..11702216w&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 117, Issue A2, CiteID A02216
Physics
3
Magnetospheric Physics: Magnetosphere/Ionosphere Interactions (2431), Magnetospheric Physics: Mhd Waves And Instabilities (2149, 6050, 7836), Magnetospheric Physics: Numerical Modeling, Magnetospheric Physics: Plasma Sheet, Magnetospheric Physics: Substorms
Scientific paper
The main goal of this paper is to estimate the errors involved in applying a quasi-static convection model such as the Rice Convection Model (RCM) or its equilibrium version (RCM-E), which neglect inertial currents, to treat the injection of fresh particles into the inner magnetosphere in a substorm expansion phase. The approach is based on the idea that the dipolarization process involves earthward motion of a bubble that consists of flux tubes that have lower values of the entropy parameter than the surrounding medium. Our tests center on comparing MHD simulations with RCM- and RCM-E-like quasi-static approximations, for cases where the bubble is considered to be a thin ideal-MHD filament. Those quasi-static solutions miss the interchange oscillations that are often a feature of the MHD results. RCM and, to a lesser extent, RCM-E calculations tend to overestimate the westward electric field at the ionospheric footprint of the bubble and underestimate its duration. However, both get the time integral of the E × B drift velocity right as well as the net energization of the particles in the filament. The quasi-static approximation is most accurate if its computed value of the braking time of the bubble's earthward motion is long compared to the period of the relevant interchange oscillation. Comparison of MHD filament simulations of interchange instability with corresponding RCM calculations suggests a similar validity criterion. For plasma sheet conditions, the quasi-static approximation is typically best if the background medium has low β, worst if it consists of highly stretched field lines.
Chen Xiao-Chun
Toffoletto Frank R.
Wolf Richard A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Thin filament simulations for Earth's plasma sheet: Tests of validity of the quasi-static convection approximation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Thin filament simulations for Earth's plasma sheet: Tests of validity of the quasi-static convection approximation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Thin filament simulations for Earth's plasma sheet: Tests of validity of the quasi-static convection approximation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1839402