Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction''

Details Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction'' Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction''

Oct 1987

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987r%26qe...30..912k&link_type=ejournal

Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics, Volume 30, Issue 10, pp.912-917

Physics

Scientific paper

Not Available

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to criticism in V. A. Borovikov's and B. E. Kinber's paper: ``Errors in the `universal and sufficient' heuristic criteria of estimating validity limits of geometric optics and of the geometric theory of diffraction'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1777175