The rarity of soft γ-ray repeaters deduced from reactivation of SGR1806 - 20

Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

127

Scientific paper

ONLY two different types of γ-ray transient sources are presently known: over one thousand γ-ray bursters (GRBs) and only three soft γ-ray repeaters (SGRs). The latter are distinguished by their propensity for recurrent burst behaviour1-3, in contrast to the nonrepeating GRB sources. Recurrent emission from one of the repeaters, SGR1900 + 14, has been detected4 earlier by the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) aboard the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory. Here we report renewed burst activity from SGR1806 - 20, the most prolific of the three known SGRs. This detection of reactivation of this source has been rapidly followed by identification of an X-ray counterpart5,6, which also coincides with a compact radio source7 now identified as a plerionic (pulsar-powered) supernova remnant8. In combination, these results are leading to a convergence of ideas about the nature of SGRs, which can now be firmly identified as neutron stars. That BATSE has detected no new sources in its two and a half years of operation indicates that SGRs are rare in our Galaxy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The rarity of soft γ-ray repeaters deduced from reactivation of SGR1806 - 20 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The rarity of soft γ-ray repeaters deduced from reactivation of SGR1806 - 20, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The rarity of soft γ-ray repeaters deduced from reactivation of SGR1806 - 20 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1585922

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.