Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Jun 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001apj...554l.127p&link_type=abstract
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 554, Issue 1, pp. L127-L127.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
3
Scientific paper
In the Letter ``The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models'' by F. Poli, N. Menci, E. Giallongo, A. Fontana, S. Cristiani, and S. D'Odorico (ApJ, 551, L45 [2001]), the magnitudes at 1700 Å in Figure 2 were incorrect. The correct figure is shown below. The corresponding best-fit parameter M* of the Schechter fit to the observed luminosity function at z=2.5-3.5 shown in the last row of Table 1 should read M*=-20.72 and M*=-20.84 for the ΩM=1, ΩΛ=0 and ΩM=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7 cosmologies, respectively.
Cristiani Stefano
D'Odorico Sandro
Fontana Adriano
Giallongo Emanuele
Menci Nicola
No associations
LandOfFree
Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1582063