Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3

Scientific paper

In the Letter ``The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models'' by F. Poli, N. Menci, E. Giallongo, A. Fontana, S. Cristiani, and S. D'Odorico (ApJ, 551, L45 [2001]), the magnitudes at 1700 Å in Figure 2 were incorrect. The correct figure is shown below. The corresponding best-fit parameter M* of the Schechter fit to the observed luminosity function at z=2.5-3.5 shown in the last row of Table 1 should read M*=-20.72 and M*=-20.84 for the ΩM=1, ΩΛ=0 and ΩM=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7 cosmologies, respectively.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Erratum: The Evolution of the Luminosity Function in Deep Fields: A Comparison with Cold Dark Matter Models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1582063

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.