The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

I GLADLY join in Dr. Jeffreys's tribute to Mach and Karl Pearson, but I would suggest that these thinkers do not constitute `science'. I do not think it can be gainsaid that the great majority of the most prominent scientific workers (Lord Kelvin, of course, springs to mind, and I think he is typical) did not regard science as Dr. Jeffreys defines it. Indeed, if the views of isolated individuals are to be accepted as `science', I am not sure that we ought not to go back much further than the eighties of last century-at least to Newton, who regarded the absoluteness of motion as having an experimental and not an a priori foundation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1579482

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.