Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 1934
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1934natur.134r.499d&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 134, Issue 3387, pp. 499 (1934).
Physics
Scientific paper
I GLADLY join in Dr. Jeffreys's tribute to Mach and Karl Pearson, but I would suggest that these thinkers do not constitute `science'. I do not think it can be gainsaid that the great majority of the most prominent scientific workers (Lord Kelvin, of course, springs to mind, and I think he is typical) did not regard science as Dr. Jeffreys defines it. Indeed, if the views of isolated individuals are to be accepted as `science', I am not sure that we ought not to go back much further than the eighties of last century-at least to Newton, who regarded the absoluteness of motion as having an experimental and not an a priori foundation.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Philosophy of Sir James Jeans will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1579482