Direct and indirect strategies for phase measurement

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

RevTeX + 3 postscript figures, 11 pages, submitted to Physical Review A

Scientific paper

Recently, Torgerson and Mandel [Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3939 (1996)] have reported a disagreement between two schemes for measuring the phase difference of a pair of optical fields. We analyze these schemes and derive their associated phase-difference probability distributions, including both their strong and weak field limits. Our calculation confirms the main point of Torgerson and Mandel of the non-uniqueness of an operational definition of the phase distribution. We further discuss the role of postselection of data and argue that it cannot meaningfully improve the sensitivity.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Direct and indirect strategies for phase measurement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Direct and indirect strategies for phase measurement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Direct and indirect strategies for phase measurement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-156967

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.