Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method

Details Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method

Sep 1993

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993georl..20.1819c&link_type=abstract

Geophysical Research Letters (ISSN 0094-8276), vol. 20, no. 17, p. 1819-1822.

Physics

4

Earthquakes, Position (Location), Seismic Waves, Spectral Correlation, Extremely High Frequencies, Signal Detection

Scientific paper

Two different methods devoted to automatic location of both regional and teleseismic events recorded on a mini-array are compared in terms of location accuracy. The first method belongs to the frequencywavenumber methods family; the second one uses signal processing to compute accurate time-delays and then derive the event parameters. In the latter method a careful study of each time-delay set is performed in order to remove ambiguity errors using Chasles relationship. It leads to an accuracy of about 10 degrees on the azimuth determination for distances smaller than 80 degrees, and 3 degrees for regional distances. Finally, a criterion derived from these relations is proposed for phase detection and identification.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Earthquake location applied to a mini-array - K-spectrum versus correlation method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1562655