Physics
Scientific paper
Aug 1989
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989phlb..226...36d&link_type=abstract
Physics Letters B, Volume 226, Issue 1-2, p. 36-38.
Physics
52
Scientific paper
Substituting a field configuration into an action and varying that action is not equivalent to substituting the configuration into the field equations. Consequently the cosmological constant measured experimentally is not in general given by the coefficient of √-g in some effective action but rather by the coefficient of gμν in the effective Einstein equations. In the case of a rank-three antisymmetric tensor potential, for example, these two quantities differ by a sign. This invalidates Hawking's proof that the cosmological constant is probably zero, and casts doubt on similar attempts based on maximizing the exponential of minus the euclidean action.
No associations
LandOfFree
The cosmological constant is possibly zero, but the proof is probably wrong does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The cosmological constant is possibly zero, but the proof is probably wrong, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The cosmological constant is possibly zero, but the proof is probably wrong will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1520990