Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufm.p51c1458s&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #P51C-1458
Physics
[2732] Magnetospheric Physics / Magnetosphere Interactions With Satellites And Rings, [2744] Magnetospheric Physics / Magnetotail, [5421] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Interactions With Particles And Fields, [6250] Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects / Moon
Scientific paper
Electron measurements made from the lunar surface by the Apollo 14 Charged Particle and Lunar Environment Experiment (CPLEE) have been used to infer dayside surface potentials of >200 V positive when in the tail lobes. Based on typical plasma conditions in the tail lobes at lunar orbit, and studies of the photoemission of electrons from lunar regolith samples, the surface is only expected to charge ~10 V positive. So this appears to suggest a factor ~20 discrepancy between observation and theory - a substantial difference which was quite puzzling. The earlier analyses had assumed the tail lobes were so tenuous that CPLEE would not be sensitive enough to detect any ambient plasma electrons, and so would only be able to measure photoelectrons attracted back to the surface (i.e., those unable to escape the lunar surface potential). Therefore, when electrons with energies up to ~200 eV were detected in the tail lobes during the lunar daytime, they were interpreted as photoelectrons attracted back by a surface potential of at least 200 V positive. A preliminary re-analysis of these CPLEE observations indicates that they can be well fitted by a bi-Maxwellian distribution (with a hot and a cold component). The tenuous hot component, which included the electrons with energies of ~200 eV, was almost certainly from the tail lobes. The source of the denser cold component is less clear since it has a temperature of ≈6.5 eV, which is over four times hotter than expected for electrons photo-emitted from the lunar surface. Possible sources for this cold component will be discussed, as well as what lunar surface potentials are consistent with the re-analysis of the CPLEE measurements.
Collier Michael R.
Farrell William M.
Stubbs Timothy J.
Vondrak Richard R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Does the Surface of the Moon Really Charge to Extreme Positive Potentials in the Magnetotail Lobes? A Re-analysis of Apollo/CPLEE observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Does the Surface of the Moon Really Charge to Extreme Positive Potentials in the Magnetotail Lobes? A Re-analysis of Apollo/CPLEE observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Does the Surface of the Moon Really Charge to Extreme Positive Potentials in the Magnetotail Lobes? A Re-analysis of Apollo/CPLEE observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1498028