Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review

Details Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review

Apr 1990

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1990e%26psl..98...33r&link_type=abstract

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 98, Issue 1, p. 33-39.

Physics

49

Scientific paper

Various evidences for a standing non-dipole field, stable with respect to reversals and thus leading to non-antidopal normal and reverse stable directions, suggest to reconsider the effect in the paleofield-remanence relationship of filtering due to lock-in time of natural remanence. Time averaging of non-antipodal stable directions leads to records that mimic the prediction of the low-order zonal harmonic model. A number of published sedimentary and intrusive records may be interpreted as such a by-product of the field behavior outside the transition itself, thus accounting for their discrepancies with volcanic records.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rationale of geomagnetic reversals versus remanence recording processes in rocks: a critical review will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1380755