Comments on: ''Is the moon really as smooth as a billiard ball?...''

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Scientific paper

Hapke and Cassidy (1978), in describing their ideas concerning sputter deposition, have criticised a number of aspects of a model for chemical fractionation and metallic iron production which is based on preferential sputtering. Questions referring to the fate of sputtered atoms, the surface roughness of the moon and the existence of metal rich layers may all be answered. Doubts may be expressed concerning the validity of some arguments used by Hapke and Cassidy since the regolith in their model is predominantly static with only episodic turnover. Some effects associated with gardening and comminution processes, and solar wind irradiation angle need to be considered. Chemical fractionation and metallic iron formation at the lunar surface is likely to be a complex process; preferential sputtering, sputter deposition and agglutination may all be involved.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comments on: ''Is the moon really as smooth as a billiard ball?...'' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comments on: ''Is the moon really as smooth as a billiard ball?...'', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comments on: ''Is the moon really as smooth as a billiard ball?...'' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1379854

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.