Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}}

Details Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}} Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}}

2012-03-05

arxiv.org/abs/1203.0936v2

Physics

High Energy Physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

8 pages

Scientific paper

We show that there are two reasons why the partial width for the transition $\Gamma_1(\Upsilon(3S)\rightarrow \gamma\chi_{b1}(1P))$ is suppressed. Firstly, the spin-averaged matrix element (m.e.) $\bar{I(3S|r|1P_J)}$ is small, being equal to 0.023 GeV$^{-1}$ in our relativistic calculations. Secondly, the spin-orbit splittings produce relatively large contributions, giving $I(3S|r|1P_2)=0.066$ GeV$^{-1}$, while due to large cancellation the m.e. $I(3S|r|1P_1)=-0.020$ GeV$^{-1}$ is small and negative; at the same time the magnitude of $I(3S|r|1P_0)=-0.063$ GeV$^{-1}$ is relatively large. These m.e. give rise to the partial widths: $\Gamma_2(\Upsilon(3S)\rightarrow \gamma\chi_{b2}(1P))=212$ eV, $\Gamma_0(\Upsilon(3S)\rightarrow \gamma\chi_{b0}(1P))=54$ eV, which are in good agreement with the CLEO and BaBar data, and also to $\Gamma_1(\Upsilon(3S)\rightarrow \gamma\chi_{b1}(1P))=13$ eV, which satisfies the BaBar limit, $\Gamma_1(exp.) < 22$ eV.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}} does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}}, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dominant spin-orbit effects in radiative decays {$Υ(3S\rightarrow γχ_{bJ}(1P))$}} will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-133505