Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002soph..211..357h&link_type=abstract
Solar Physics, v. 211, Issue 1, p. 357-370 (2002).
Physics
77
Scientific paper
We examine the `Group' sunspot numbers constructed by Hoyt and Schatten to determine their utility in characterizing the solar activity cycle. We compare smoothed monthly Group sunspot numbers to Zürich (International) sunspot numbers, 10.7-cm radio flux, and total sunspot area. We find that the Zürich numbers follow the 10.7-cm radio flux and total sunspot area measurements only slightly better than the Group numbers. We examine several significant characteristics of the sunspot cycle using both Group numbers and Zürich numbers. We find that the `Waldmeier Effect' - the anti-correlation between cycle amplitude and the elapsed time between minimum and maximum of a cycle - is much more apparent in the Zürich numbers. The `Amplitude-Period Effect' - the anti-correlation between cycle amplitude and the length of the previous cycle from minimum to minimum - is also much more apparent in the Zürich numbers. The `Amplitude-Minimum Effect' - the correlation between cycle amplitude and the activity level at the previous (onset) minimum is equally apparent in both the Zürich numbers and the Group numbers. The `Even-Odd Effect' - in which odd-numbered cycles are larger than their even-numbered precursors - is somewhat stronger in the Group numbers but with a tighter relationship in the Zürich numbers. The `Secular Trend' - the increase in cycle amplitudes since the Maunder Minimum - is much stronger in Group numbers. After removing this trend we find little evidence for multi-cycle periodicities like the 80-year Gleissberg cycle or the two- and three-cycle periodicities. We also find little evidence for a correlation between the amplitude of a cycle and its period or for a bimodal distribution of cycle periods. We conclude that the Group numbers are most useful for extending the sunspot cycle data further back in time and thereby adding more cycles and improving the statistics. However, the Zürich numbers are slightly more useful for characterizing the on-going levels of solar activity.
Hathaway David H.
Reichmann Edwin J.
Wilson Robert M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Group Sunspot Numbers: Sunspot Cycle Characteristics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Group Sunspot Numbers: Sunspot Cycle Characteristics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Group Sunspot Numbers: Sunspot Cycle Characteristics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1309670