Monolithic versus segmented primary mirror concepts for space telescopes

Physics – Optics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

A number of ongoing astrophysical mission concept studies are based on large aperture spaceborne telescopes. As optics get larger, both manufacturing and engineering trades come into consideration and must be balanced with the science goals and requirements. One of the top-level telescope trades examines the impact of a large monolithic primary mirror versus an array of smaller mirror segments to either fully or sparsely populate the same aperture. The first consideration is the scientific impact. Should the scattered edge effects and diffraction of a segmented design be acceptable, it then becomes a fabrication, test, and cost trade along with any associated risks. This paper will examine some of the key factors that go into such a trade and looks at manufacturing breakpoints. Examples such as the 4-m aperture New World Observer (NWO) and the 8-m aperture Advanced Technology Large Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST) will be presented.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Monolithic versus segmented primary mirror concepts for space telescopes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Monolithic versus segmented primary mirror concepts for space telescopes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Monolithic versus segmented primary mirror concepts for space telescopes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1301344

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.