Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 1985
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1985pggp.rept..174w&link_type=abstract
In NASA, Washington Repts. of Planetary Geol. and Geophys. program, 1984 p 174-176 (SEE N85-23474 13-91)
Physics
Geochronology, Impact Melts, Impactors, Lunar Geology, Lunar Surface, Planetary Geology, Geodynamics, Geomorphology, Meteorites, Particle Tracks
Scientific paper
Two distinct episodes of impacting are recorded on the Moon's surface. An early episode marked by an intense barrage that included basin-forming projectiles ended about 3.8 aeons ago when the Orientale basin was created. The second episode, after 3.2 or 3.3 aeons ago, was marked by a much lower impact rate. These very different rates are separated by a short transition period during the Late Imbrian Epoch. It is found that a constant preImbrian impact rate is consistent with all the relevant observations and with the following lunar historical scenario: (1) crustal solidification between about 4.3 and 4.25 aeons ago; (2) formation of Procellarum, South Pole-Aitken, about 22 now-obliterated basins, and about 2,850 now-obliterated 30 to 300 km craters between 4.25 and 4.1 aeons ago; and (3) formation of 39 still-preserved basins, 1,200 still-perserved craters, and 2,200 now-obliterated craters between 4.1 and 3.85 aeons ago. At the constant rate, the amount of mass that impacted the Moon since crustal solidification would not greatly exceed the amount that has left a permanent visible record.
No associations
LandOfFree
Why not a constant early lunar impact rate? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Why not a constant early lunar impact rate?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why not a constant early lunar impact rate? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1290003