Virial and Jet-induced Velocities in Seyfert Galaxies. III. Galaxy Luminosity as Virial Parameter

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

81

Galaxies: Jets, Galaxies: Kinematics And Dynamics, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Galaxies: Stellar Content, Line: Profiles

Scientific paper

This is the third paper in a series which aims to identify the acceleration mechanisms acting on the ionized gas in the narrow line region (NLR) of Seyfert galaxies. Using the sample and approach described in Papers I and II, galaxy luminosity, M_tot_, and bulge luminosity, M_bul_, are taken as the principal parameters describing nuclear virial speeds, while radio luminosity and morphology are used to track possible nuclear perturbations. The fundamental conclusions from Paper II are confirmed. Plots of [O III] FWHM versus M_tot_ or M_bul_ show strong correlations (R ~ 0.6, P_null_~10^-8^) indicating that gravity plays a key role in defining the NLR velocity field. However, Seyfert galaxies with linear radio morphology and high radio luminosity (L_1415_>=10^22.5^ W Hz^-1^) have systematically broader lines, suggesting that acceleration of NLR gas by outflowing jets is also important in some Seyferts. For Seyfert galaxies without linear radio sources, [O III] FWHM is more fundamentally related to M_bul_ than M_tot_. Indeed, the scatter in the M_tot_ versus [O III] FWHM relation has a Hubble-type dependence which is identical to the Hubble-type dependence of the bulge/total ratio used in the evaluation of M_bul_ from M_tot_. This agreement between photometrically defined bulge/total ratio for normal spirals and kinematically defined bulge/total ratio for Seyfert galaxies lends powerful support to the argument that M_bul_ is playing the fundamental role. A fit to the M_bul_ versus [O III] FWHM relation of the form L_bul_ is proportional to (FWHM)^n^ gives gradient n ~ 2.2, zero point FWHM_20_~ 250 km s^-1^ (where FWHM_20_ = FWHM at M_bul_ = -20), and ~1 mag scatter. This is compared to the Faber-Jackson relation for normal galaxies, L_bul_ is proportional to (FWHM_stars_)^n^, where n ~ 3.2 and FWHM_20_~360 km s^-1^. The overall similarity of these two relations supports the virial origin of [O III] FWHM. In detail, however, the Seyferts appear offset from the Faber-Jackson relation. The offset may be viewed in two ways. Either FWHM_[O III]~ 0.7 x FWHM_stars_, or Seyfert galaxies are ~1 mag more luminous than normal spirals for a given bulge (or total) mass. The possibility that Seyfert galaxies are overluminous is investigated using the Tully-Fisher relation, M_tot_ versus {DELTA}V^c^_rot_. There is some indication that Seyfert galaxies, particularly those of early type, are offset, although the effect is confused by the underlying Hubble-type dependence of the Tully-Fisher relation. The situation is clarified using a normalized Tully-Fisher plot in which this type dependence is removed. It seems that Seyfert galaxies are indeed offset relative to normal spirals (P_null_ ~ 10^-5^), implying M/L ratios lower by a factor ~1.5-2.0. Both the Faber-Jackson and Tully-Fisher offsets for Seyfert galaxies are compared to similar offsets found previously for peculiar radio galaxies and spirals in compact groups. It is possible that enhanced star formation causes lower M/L ratios in Seyfert galaxies, although the absence of a correlation between offset and galaxy color excess fails to support this possibility. Offsets on the M_bul_ versus [O III] FWHM plot are further analyzed by introducing additional variables. There is no dependence on Seyfert type, inclination, Hubble type, or redshift. Unbarred Seyfert galaxies show a tighter correlation than barred Seyfert galaxies (P_null_ ~ 0.04) suggesting that bars can modify the NLR velocity field. The strongest result, however, is that disturbed and interacting Seyfert galaxies have significantly broader lines (P_null_ ~ 10^-4^), showing that external perturbations can influence nuclear gas. A plot of Faber-Jackson offsets against perturbation class (a 1-6 ranking scale based on Dahari's IAC parameter) shows a positive correlation which converges on zero offset for maximally disturbed galaxies. If offsets reflect dissipational settling of gas into a soft nuclear potential, then external perturbations may act to reestablish overall virial equilibrium. The historically significant correlations between [O III] FWHM and radio luminosity, L_1415_, and [O III] luminosity, L_5007_, are reanalyzed in the light of jet perturbations and the virial relations. Although the [O III] FWHM versus L_1415_ correlation is very strong (R ~ 0.6, P_null_~ 10^-10^), removing the luminous linear radio sources merely weakens the correlation but does not destroy it. The remaining correlation is indirect and exists principally because L_1415_ is itself tied to the virial parameter M_bul_ in a relation of the form L_radio_ is proportional to L^2.6^_bul_ (R~ 0.6, P_null_~10^- 7^). Interestingly, similar correlations with M_tot_ or M_disk_ are significantly weaker, suggesting that development of the nuclear radio source depends on the bulge potential, although the origin of this dependence is not yet clear. The relation between [O III] FWHM and [O III] luminosity (R~0.4, P_null_~10^-6^) is probably of indirect origin, since L_5007_ correlates very strongly with L_1415_(L_5007_ is proportional to L^1.1^_1415_,R~0.7,P_null_~10^-16^) and also with M_bul_(L_5007_ is proportional to L^2.5^_bul_, R~0.5,P_null_~10^-7^ both of which share direct causal ties to [O III] FWHM. Interestingly, the correlation between L_5007_ and M_bul_ is stronger than with either M_tot_ or M_disk_. This reinforces the suggestion that the spheroidal mass plays an important role in defining not only NLR kinematics but also NLR luminosities, both radio and emission line.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Virial and Jet-induced Velocities in Seyfert Galaxies. III. Galaxy Luminosity as Virial Parameter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Virial and Jet-induced Velocities in Seyfert Galaxies. III. Galaxy Luminosity as Virial Parameter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Virial and Jet-induced Velocities in Seyfert Galaxies. III. Galaxy Luminosity as Virial Parameter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1215069

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.